Thunder Even the Series: OKC's Bench Buries the Spurs in Game 2

Thunder Even the Series: OKC's Bench Buries the Spurs in Game 2

The defending champions remembered who they were.

Two nights after getting stunned at home in Game 1, the Oklahoma City Thunder responded the way the best team in basketball is supposed to β€” leaning on their absurd depth, tightening up the defense in exactly the spots that failed them, and grinding out a 122-113 win over the San Antonio Spurs to even the Western Conference Finals at 1-1.

The series now shifts to San Antonio, tied, with Game 3 on Friday. The Spurs got what they came to OKC for β€” a split, home-court advantage back in their pocket. But Game 2 was a reminder of why the Thunder were favored in the first place. When OKC plays its game, the Thunder are very, very hard to beat.

Let's break it down.

The Game Flow

The quarter-by-quarter shows a game that was tight until OKC's depth slowly pulled it apart:

1st quarter: Thunder 31, Spurs 31. Even. 2nd quarter: Thunder 31, Spurs 20. OKC takes control. 3rd quarter: Thunder 34, Spurs 37. San Antonio claws. 4th quarter: Thunder 26, Spurs 25. OKC holds.

The decisive stretch was the second quarter. After a track-meet first quarter that ended 31-31, the Thunder clamped down and held San Antonio to 20 points in the second β€” an 11-point swing that put OKC ahead 62-51 at the half. The Spurs made runs in the second half, even won the third quarter, but they never got the lead back. OKC's biggest lead was 13. Every time San Antonio threatened, the Thunder had an answer β€” and the answer, all night, was the bench.

The OKC Bench Won This Game

Here's the number that decided Game 2: OKC's bench scored 57 points. San Antonio's bench scored 25.

A 32-point bench advantage. In a 9-point game. That's the whole story.

The Thunder's depth has been their superpower for two years, and in Game 2 it was overwhelming:

Alex Caruso: 17 points off the bench on 5-of-7 shooting, 3-of-4 from three, +18. Caruso was the best plus/minus player in the game. He hit timely threes, he defended his tail off, and he gave OKC exactly the two-way jolt they needed every time the Spurs made a push.

Cason Wallace: 12 points on a perfect 4-of-4 from three, 4 steals, 4 assists. Wallace didn't miss a shot all night and was a disruptive menace defensively.

Jared McCain: 12 points, 6 rebounds. The rookie kept the second unit humming even on an off shooting night (4-of-14).

Isaiah Hartenstein: 10 points, 13 rebounds (8 offensive!), 3 assists. Hartenstein was a monster on the glass β€” eight offensive rebounds by himself, constantly extending OKC possessions.

Ajay Mitchell: 10 points, 4 steals.

Five bench players in double figures or close to it. That's a luxury no other team in the league has, and it's the single biggest reason OKC is the favorite to win the title. When the Thunder's bench plays like this, they don't lose.

SGA Bounced Back

After a rough 7-of-23 shooting night in the Game 1 loss, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander looked like the MVP again.

30 points, 9 assists, 4 rebounds. 12-of-24 shooting. 6-of-6 from the line. Just 1 turnover. +14.

That's the SGA the Thunder needed. He got back to his spots in the mid-range, controlled the tempo, picked apart the Spurs' defense for 9 assists against a single turnover, and didn't force anything. The 1-turnover, 9-assist line is the mark of a guard in total control. San Antonio's Game 1 defensive game plan on SGA worked. In Game 2, he solved it.

Chet Holmgren added 13 points and was a +6 β€” a quiet but functional bounce-back after getting outplayed by Wemby in the opener. Jalen Williams chipped in. The Thunder got contributions up and down the roster, which is exactly how they're built to win.

Wemby Was Still Wemby β€” It Just Wasn't Enough

For San Antonio, the frustrating part is that Victor Wembanyama was still excellent and they still lost.

Victor Wembanyama: 21 points, 17 rebounds, 6 assists, 4 blocks. 8-of-16 shooting, 3-of-7 from three. All four of his second-chance opportunities went in. He posted a 39 efficiency rating, anchored the Spurs' defense, and protected the rim with four blocks.

It wasn't the 41-and-24 masterpiece from Game 1 β€” but it was still a dominant two-way performance from a 22-year-old. The problem wasn't Wemby.

The problem was the turnovers. The Spurs coughed it up 21 times, and OKC β€” the best transition and steal team in the league β€” turned those giveaways into 27 points. You cannot give the Thunder 27 free points and expect to win. San Antonio shot the ball better than OKC (48.8% to 47.9%, 40% from three to 36%, a higher effective field goal percentage), out-rebounded them on the offensive glass, and still lost by 9 β€” because they handed Oklahoma City an extra dozen possessions.

Stephon Castle had 25 points and 8 assists β€” but 9 turnovers. That's the Game 2 story in one stat line. Castle was brilliant as a scorer (10-of-17, 14 points in the paint) and a disaster as a ball-handler. OKC's pressure defense, led by Caruso and Wallace, hounded him into mistake after mistake. Nine turnovers from your lead guard in a conference finals game is a recipe for a loss, no matter how well he scores.

Devin Vassell kept them in it β€” 22 points on 6-of-12 from three, a genuinely great shooting night. Dylan Harper had a quieter 12 points after his 7-steal Game 1 explosion. But the supporting cast couldn't overcome the turnover bug.

What the Series Looks Like Now

Tied 1-1, heading to San Antonio. Here's where things stand:

The Spurs got the split they wanted. Go on the road, steal one, get home court back. Mission accomplished β€” they did exactly that. They proved in Game 1 they can beat OKC. They proved nothing in Game 2 that should shake their confidence except the turnovers, which are fixable.

OKC reasserted itself. The Thunder showed that Game 1 was the anomaly, not the new normal. When they take care of the ball, defend in space, and let their bench eat, they're the best team in basketball. The 57-point bench night is a flashing reminder of their championship-level depth.

The turnover battle is the series. San Antonio had 21 turnovers in Game 2 and 27 OKC points came off them. If the Spurs cut that number to 13-14, they win this game. Ball security β€” specifically from Castle β€” is the single biggest swing factor heading to Game 3.

The win probability model now favors San Antonio at home: Spurs 53.8%, Thunder 46.2% for Game 3. Home court matters, and the Spurs have it back.

What's Next

Game 3: Friday, May 22. 8:30 PM ET. San Antonio.

The Frost Bank Center is going to be deafening. The Spurs are back in the Western Conference Finals for the first time since 2014, and their fans haven't had a home conference finals game in over a decade. Wemby on his home floor, with a chance to put the defending champs in a 2-1 hole β€” that's going to be an electric environment.

For OKC, the message is simple: protect the ball, let the bench cook, and trust that you're the deeper, more experienced team. For San Antonio, it's even simpler: stop turning the ball over. Wemby and Vassell and Castle gave them more than enough offense to win Game 2. They just kept handing it back.

This series is now exactly what we hoped it would be: the best team in basketball against the most exciting young team in basketball, tied 1-1, with the next three games featuring at least one in San Antonio's building.

The Western Conference Finals are a series. Strap in.

Game 3: Friday at 8:30 PM ET. Series tied 1-1. The Spurs go home.

Back to blog